[Monett Times] Fair ~ 52°F  
High: 78°F ~ Low: 55°F
Friday, May 6, 2016

Realtors briefed on loan market

Monday, December 13, 2010

The current climate for selling houses and a shift in regulations prompted the Southwest Board of Realtors to ask banker Bob Markovics from UMB Bank in Monett to speak about changes in the mortgage industry.

Markovics said the basic underwriting guidelines from the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) had grown four-fold since he got his last book of regulations five years ago. Tougher regulations intended to put the home loan industry "back on track" were put in place.

The Federal National Mortgage Association, known as Fannie Mae, used to spend considerable time reviewing home loans that ended up in default. Markovics said regulators looked for guidelines to fix the system, weeding out loan risks or practices that promoted problematic loans.

"From the mid-1950s to the early 1990s, Fannie Mae would adjust guidelines to protect the economy based on what they saw, looking forward and in the rear view mirror at the same time," Markovics said.

The industry made an effort to police itself. Risk persisted from a few lenders who stepped outside of the guidelines, hoping their loans would not come to the attention of regulators unless the loans failed.

Then the philosophy changed, Markovics said. The idea that everyone should be able to buy a home took over. Buyers with weaker credit got loans. Fannie Mae endorsed the theory that borrowers paying high interest would have more at risk and strive to be more diligent to preserve their loans. The high interest loans would bring in more money for the banks and thus offset the greater risk involved.

"There was a fallacy in the belief," Markovics said. "A higher interest rate does not change the behavior of the borrower. A poor credit performance will stay that way."

From 2004 to 2006, many mortgage lenders moved into subprime products, which are mortgages that started at a low rate to look attractive then increased over time to cover costs.

"I was trained by Fannie Mae and endorsed its previous approach," Markovics said. "As an underwriter, I didn't believe the liberal underwriting guidelines were in the best interest of the bank or the borrower."

HUD, which sets standards for low interest Farmers Home Administration (FMHA) loans, took a different approach from Fannie Mae. Markovics said HUD loan guidelines stipulated that if a loan goes bad and the lender did not follow HUD's directives, then the loaning institution would go on notice to repurchase the loan or face cancellation of HUD's mortgage insurance.

"That's what Fannie Mae should have done four years ago," Markovics said.

The position of the realtor in transactions has shifted as well. Markovics said in the past, real estate agents, builders and sellers provided lenders with documents to support making the loan. HUD regulations now consider documents from these sources to be a conflict of interest and they cannot be considered.

Another new guideline affects the definition of a borrower's income. If a borrower has worked less than an average of 40 hours a week in the last year, then the borrower must use the lower number of hours to calculate the borrower's base income. Markovics said this is the first time he has seen an income analysis like this in the regulations.

Back in the early 1980s, when interest rates ran around 20 percent, Markovics said only a limited group of people bought houses: those who were ready, those upsizing due to family size or those getting transferred. Today, Markovics said the economy, rather than high interest rates, dictate purchases. Again, the same types of buyers make up today's market.

"HUD has made tighter guidelines. All we have to do is observe them," Markovics said. "Lenders and realtors need to work together to make sure the process is as pain free as possible."

According to Markovics, realtors need to educate home buyers about borrowing. He suggested realtors get prospective home buyers pre-qualified for a mortgage before showing them houses to avoid frustration, wasting time and losing potential business.

"I wanted them to understand the environment," Markovics said. "The rule book is the same. Don't let that deter you from selling houses or helping buyers and sellers."

Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on monett-times.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

A little history: "Farmers Home Administration" per se ceased to exist in the 1990s. The agency split off its farm loans,which transferred to the USDA Farm Service Agency (FSA, from its community development-type programs and housing programs. The agency initially became known as "Rural Economic and Community Development" (RECD). Following that, the name was shortened to simply (USDA)RURAL DEVELOPMENT. Just so everyone knows, FARMERS HOME ADMINISTRATION as such NO LONGER EXISTS and is now known as USDA Rural Development. Its mission is dedicated to the future of rural communities.

-- Posted by Iamjedi1 on Wed, Dec 15, 2010, at 8:37 AM

Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration:

© 2016 Monett Times, a division of Rust Publishing MOARCASS, L.L.C. All rights reserved.